![]() ![]() 3 city is another one well-suited for active retirees. Luckily, Boise and Nampa are close by, offering bigger-city resources. The city provides 1.99 medical centers per 1,000 residents which can make it a little tight in getting care. The city puts up pretty low numbers when looking at medical centers, recreation centers and retirement communities. Those age 65 and over make up 18% of Emmett’s population. You’ll also be comforted to know you won’t be the only retiree in Sandpoint, with its retirement communities and a senior population making up 19% of the city’s population. Having enough access to medical facilities is crucial, especially in retirement. Sandpoint also tops the list in medical centers per 1,000 residents (6.34) and retirement communities per 1,000 (0.66). The city also has the highest number of recreation centers in this study with 1.98 available per 1,000 residents. There’s a ton more to do in the small city, too, including the Kinnikinnick Native Plant Society’s arboretum, the Bonner County History Museum and regular farmers’ markets. Active retirees will find many opportunities for biking, boating and even skiing. ![]() This north Idaho city offers great access to Lake Pend Oreille and the Pend Oreille River. Sandpointįor a relaxing lakeside retirement, head to Sandpoint. Finally, we checked the percentage of seniors living in each city. We also looked at the number of certain facilities per 1,000 residents including medical centers, recreation centers and retirement communities. However, there are many other cities out there with much higher tax burdens. This is not the most ideal number out there, with many cities in other states posing tax burdens of a few percentage points lower. All the cities listed below have a tax burden of 16.9%. Tax burden in retirement for each city comes from 2018. To determine the best places to retire in Idaho, we weighed a number of different factors crucial to retirement. How We Determined the Best Places to Retire in Idaho ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |